Uncategorized

  • It's An Interesting World

    Put this one down in the strange laws category.  It seems that it is illegal for women to wear "trousers" in Paris.  Yep.  That's right.  According to The Telegraph, "The rule banning women from dressing like men – namely by wearing trousers - was first introduced in 1800 by Paris' police chief and has survived repeated attempts to repeal it." 

    The latest attempt to remove the rule came in 2003, but the Ministers again refused to remove it from the books saying that, "Disuse is sometimes more efficient than (state) intervention in adapting the law to changing morays."  This despite the fact that all female police officers in Paris are compelled by police regulation to wear pants, resulting in a situation where all of them have to break the law everyday. 

    It's an interesting world we live in.

  • It's Time To Be Thankful

    Well, Featured_Grownups whats to know some things that I am thankful for this season. There are, of course, the obvious things like family, friends, and kids and such, but there are also many little things we seldom think about. Here are but a few such things.

  • I'm thankful that I live in this country with its many blessings.
  • I am thankful for good health at my age.
  • I'm thankful for having had an opportunity to get a good education.
  • I'm thankful for the ability to read.
  • I am thankful for computers that provided me with an exceptionally good career for almost 40 years.
  • I'm thankful that I have lived to see the growth of technology from its infancy.
  • I'm thankful for the shelter I have and the food on my plate.
  • I'm thankful for soft, fluffy kittens and little puppy dogs.
  • I'm thankful for the color of the Autumn leaves and for the Spring flowers.
  • I'm thankful for the sun and the wind and the rain.

    How many things are you greatful for that you take for granted most of the time?
  • How Low Will He Go?

    First the King of Saudi Arabia and now the Emperor of Japan.  Bowing before a national leader is not just a sign of great respect.  It is also a sign of deference to a superior individual and leader.  It is a sign of subservience. For this reason, no national leader ever bows down before another national leader.  Yet our idiot seems not to be able to learn from his past mistakes.  He seems to think that running a country is a blackboard exercise in a classroom! Just how low will he go to humiliate us.  Is he learning impaired in addition to everything else? 

    Obama Bows Down Before Japanese Emperor
    Photo from the LA Times.
     
    I love my country, and I have a great deal of respect for the office of the President of The United States, but henceforth, while obama holds the office, whenever I refer to him by title, I shall use the title with a lower case "p" as I will with his name.  That is what president obama seems to want.  The incompetent fool.   What a disgrace!!!   

  • IF . . .

    If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a teleprompter installed to be able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said this is more proof of how inept he is on his own and is really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes? 

    If George W. Bush had spent of thousands of tax payer dollars to take Laura Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved?

    If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan's holdings of GM stock by 90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved?

    If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved?

    If George W. Bush had given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful and  historically significant gift, would you have approved?

    If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and  tacky?

    If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi  Arabia , would you have approved?

    If George W. Bush has bowed to the Emperior of Japan, would you have approved? 

    If George W. Bush had visited Austria  and made reference to the non-existent "Austrian language," would you have brushed it off as a minor slip?

    If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people who cannot seem to keep current in their income taxes, would you have approved?

    If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to "Cinco de Cuatro" in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the 5th of May (Cinco de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you have winced in embarrassment?

    If George W. Bush had mis-spelled the word "advice" would you have hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and potatoe as proof of what a dunce he is?

    If George W.  Bush had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a single tree on Earth Day, would you have concluded he's a hypocrite?

    If George W. Bush's administration had okayed Air Force One flying low over millions of people followed by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they actually get what happened on 9-11?

    If George W. Bush had created the position of 32 Czars who report directly to him, bypassing the House and Senate on much of what is happening in America, would you have approved?

    If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO of a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have  approved?

    If George W. Bush had proposed to double the national debt, which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate, in one year, would you  have approved?

    If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved?


    So, tell  me again, what is it about Obama that makes him so brilliant and impressive? Can't think of anything? Don't  worry. He's done all this in 10 months -- so you'll have three more years to come up with an answer. 

     

  • The Giant Con Job Continues

    Can a 'good' muslim be a good American? 

    First, let's look at who is a "Good Muslim." I do not refer here to the muslim who "sort of" follows his religion, or the one who prays occassionally or goes to the mosque occassionally. They would be in the same category as the occassional, Sunday morning Christian, and for the most part, they are very nice, friendly people. A "Good Muslim", on the other hand, follows the tenents of his religion to the letter and is probably a fundamentalist. He is a devoted follower who makes his religion his way of life. He reads the Quran daily and believes every word the Mullahs (spiritual leaders) say. If they call for Jihad, he chants for Jihad.

    Given this distinction, the answer to the question really has to be a resounding no. Why? Because democracy and Islam can not co-exist for many reasons.

  • Theologically - no, because his allegiance is to Allah, The moon God of Arabia.

  • Religiously - no, because no other religion is accepted by his Allah except Islam (Quran, 2:256).

  • Scripturally - no, because his allegiance is to the five Pillars of Islam and the Quran.

  • Geographically - no, because his allegiance is to Mecca , to which he turns in prayer five times a day.

  • Socially - no, because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews.

  • Politically - no, because he must submit to the mullahs, who teach annihilation of Israel and destruction of America, the great Satan.

  • Domestically - no, because he is instructed to marry upto four Women and beat and scourge his wife(s) when she disobeys him (Quran 4:34).

  • Intellectually - no, because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt. Nor can he accept the Constitution as the supreme law of the land, which even trumps the word of the mullahs.

  • Philosophically - no, because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran do not allow freedom of religion and expression.

  • Spiritually - no, because when we declare 'one nation under God,' we speak of the Judeo-Christian God who is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as "heavenly father," nor is he ever called "love" in the Quran's 99 excellent names.

    Every Muslim government in the world is either dictatorial or autocratic. Why?  Because their very concept of life is fundamentally opposed to the American way of life; and it is because of this that Muslims in this country cannot be both 'good' Muslims and 'good' Americans.  This latest incident at Fort Hood is just one more proof of this. 

    But what happens?  Instead of being outraged, the president and the politically correct press immediately go into self-protective mode by reinforcing the giant con job they have tried to foster on the American psyche.  It goes something like this: He was a crazy! It was an isolated incident! It was "vicarious" Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder! It was "Pre-Traumatic" Stress Disorder! It was radical extremism! It was part of a tiny fringe! It doesn't represent Islam!

    All lies!!  He was devout.  He was a jihadist.  Period.  And ignoring the truth doesn't change the fact that every devout Muslim who believes in the word of the Quran has his or her duty to Islam, his call to jihad. The more people who understand this, and the sooner our "leaders" come to grips with this, the better it will be for our country and our future. 

    As for it being just an isolated incident, I feel the need to remind folks of just a few of the Islamic related incidents inside the U.S. that have occurred in the last 8 weeks alone:

  • Sept 14 - New York - Najibullah Zazi, the man at the center of an alleged plot to blow up transportation targets in New York City, is scheduled to appear before a Brooklyn judge. Najibullah Zazi is accused of plotting to use weapons of mass destruction against U.S. targets in what law enforcement officials say was the most serious terrorist threat against the U.S. since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

    Sept 24 - Michael Finton, also known as Talib Islam, a convert to Islam, was arrested in Springfield, Illinois, on charges he tried to blow up a federal building in the state capital.   He was also charged with attempted murder of federal officers or employees and trying to use a weapon of mass destruction.

  • Sept 24 - RALEIGH, North Carolina (Reuters) - Two men charged in North Carolina last month with plotting terrorist attacks overseas also planned to attack the U.S. Marine Corps base in Quantico, Virginia.  The two, Daniel Patrick Boyd and Hysen Sherifi, trained in terrorist camps in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

  • Sept 24 - New York - A New York man, Betim Kaziu, was indicted on for allegedly seeking training from Islamic militants in Pakistan to fight U.S. troops.

  • Sept 26 - A 19-year-old Jordanian accused of trying to blow up a downtown Dallas office tower.  He parked an SUV packed with what he thought were explosives outside Fountain Place, a 60-story office tower at Ross Avenue and Field Street.

  • Oct 21 - Mass - A 27 year old Mass. man, Tarek Mehanna, was arrested for conspiring to kill two US politicians and to carry out a holy war by attacking shoppers in US malls with machine guns.
  • Oct 28 - Detroit - Islamic leader Luqman Ameen Abdullah was killed in gun battle with Federal agents working on a counterterrorism task force that was trying to arrest him on various criminal charges.
     
    Still think it's an isolated case?  Wake up America!!

  • I Like Escalators

    "I like an escalator because an escalator can never break, it can only become stairs. There would never be an escalator temporarily out of order sign, only an escalator temporarily stairs. Sorry for the convenience." -- Mitch Hedberg

  • They Walk Among Us

    During a recent password audit at a local company, it was found that a young blond was using the following password:

    MickeyMinniePlutoHueyLouieDeweyDonaldGoofy

    When asked why such a big password, she said that it had to be at least 8 characters long.

    They walk among us, and they vote.

  • Love's Tragedy

    I saw a dateish site the other day where a young girl was relating how her boyfriend's family disapproves of her, even after the two have been together for two years -- not because she has tatoos, has an unpleasant personality, steals, lies, or anything like that.  His family hates her because she is Japanese, while he and they are Chinese.  She cannot speak Chinese.  And then there is the historical fact of past wars between the two nations, which his family can not get beyond, even though they themselves were born after the last of those wars was fought.  Learned hatred passed from one generation to the next.

    It is such a tragedy when these things happen.  Unfortunately it is all too common among all peoples of the world.  Tradition says you marry your own kind.  That hurts when you happen to be in love with someone who doesn't qualify in your family's eyes or the eyes of his family.  How many family relationships have suffered because a white married a black, or because an American veteran chose to marry a Vietnamese girl, or because a Catholic man chose to marry a Jewish girl, or a Muslim chose to marry a non-muslim?

    The list is seemingly endless, and no matter how this particular poster's situation turns out, the boyfriend will suffer along with the girl.  She can threaten to leave him if he doesn't choose between her and his family, but that would be wrong and cause an irreparable rift between the two of them. 

    On the other hand, she might tell him she's had enough and leave to avoid the constant emotional stress of the situation.  In that case, he will suffer the loss and heartbreak and will certainly blame his family for driving the two of them apart.  It will also give the family more ammunition to say, "See, we told you she wasn't the one for you." 

    The two of them could talk the situation through between themselves, but that can have only one of two outcomes.  They might agree to separate, in which case both will suffer, while the family gloats over it's victory.  In the process, he may come to resent his family for driving the two of them apart, resulting in years of emotional stress for himself and his family as well as the girl herself.

    But if the two of them eventually marry, he is put in the position of having to choose between the love of his life and turning his back on his family.  They may even refuse to attend the wedding.  He will blame them initially, but in time he may also come to blame her for the loss of his family.

    Nobody wins in these relationships, unless both sides are completely alone in this world.  I think it is a real shame that the two of them allowed this relationship to go as far as it has without resolving the issue long ago.

    How do you think this should be handled?

  • Thanksgiving Day Tradition As A Child

    We never had family or friends over on Thanksgiving Day when I was growing up, but it was always a busy day around my house nonetheless.  My mother always a turkey, and it was my job to help with the dressing to stuff the bird with.  Those were the days when we didn't go to the store and buy a Stove Top Stuffing mix.  Oh no.  We started with two or three loaves of bread, manually tearing slices into thumb sized pieces until we had enough to fill the bird and some more besides, and we mixed our own spices to season it with.

    While I for was doing that, my mother for her part would prepare a home made chicken soup from an old world german recipe she got from her mother.  When I say homemade, I mean homemade.  No cans here.  It started by boiling the chicken and then removing the meat from the bones.  Add some fresh vegetables and secret spices, and let it cook on the stove top slowly for four or five hours to really get the flavor right.

    Just about the time she was putting the soup on the stove, I finishing up with the tearing of the bread.  At that point, my mother had a special old world mix of spices she used to season the torn bread, and once properly seasoned, the stuffing was put into the bird to overflowing, and into the oven it went.  Along with it went any extra stuffing that wouldn't fit into the bird -- in oven proof bowls of course -- and some sweet potatoes wrapped in tin foil.

    About an hour before the bird was ready to come out of the oven, mom prepared something she called Armenian String Beans.  I don't remember too much about them except that tomatoes and onions figured into the mix.  No canned stuff here. Fresh beans were washed and hand cut, onions were hand peeled and diced onions, and the same for the tomatoes.  Some other ingredients too.  Boy that was good. 

    She also prepared a special lemon sauce, made from the chicken soup that was still on the stove and simmering to keep it warm.  Sounds strange doesn't it.  A lemon flavored sauce, thickened to a creamy texture, coming from chicken soup of all things, though you wouldn't know it from the taste.  This sauce was used as a topping for a hugh bowl of rice.  I loved that sauce.  I think I have the recipe for it around here someplace.  While she was doing that, I was making the homemade dinner rolls, under her supervision of course.

    And lets not forget the pumpkin pies.  Those she and I used to make the night before.  I made the pie shells, from scratch of course, preparing and rolling the dough, and shaping the shells in the metal pans she used, while mom created the filling from some pumpkins she had bought at the store and the spice mix her mother had taught her.

    And what were my dad and my brother doing while my mom and I worked the kitchen?  Why silly, they were watching football of course.

    Anyway, after five or six hours of work on Thanksgiving Day, we were ready to eat, usually around 3 or 4 in the afternoon.  And of course, we always had leftovers of everything for a week.  Ditto for Christmas.  I haven't had such great meals since I left home and struck out on my own.

    So the real tradition in my home seems to have been that on the holidays, everything was homemade.  The cranberry sauce is about the only thing that actually came out of a can or a box on Thanksgiving, except maybe some flour and corn starch.

    But that was then, and the meaning of holidays changes as you go from being a child to a kid, a teen to a young adult, to providing holiday magic for your own children, and to being a senior citizen.  Things always change, and as Mr. Spock would say, "Change is the essential process of all existence."

  • Maine Voters Reject Gay Marriage

    With all the news focused on the political races in Virginia, New Jersey, and New York, few have noticed a ballot question in the State of Maine.  The question:  Did Maine voters want to repeal a law allowing same-sex marriage that had passed the Legislature and was signed by Democratic Gov. John Baldacci. 

    By the end of the evening of voting, Maine voters did want the law repealed, and gays who had gathered for what they hoped would be a victory celebration went home near tears.

    "I'm ready to start crying," said Cecelia Burnett, a 58-year-old massage therapist, walking out of the ballroom with her partner Ann Swanson at her side. "I don't understand what the fear is, why people are so afraid of this change.

    "It hurts. It hurts personally," she said. "It's a personal rejection of us and our relationship, and I don't understand what the fear is."

    I sympathize with gay people for the discrimination that they must endure, but on the issue of marriage, they are helping to bring this discrimination upon themselves.  The concept of Marriage is, and always has been, a religious one going back to man's earliest recorded history.  The State never became involved in the relationship between two individuals until it realized that it could charge a one-time tax (sell a marriage license) for recording the fact that two people wished to commit themselves to each other.  When gays demand the legal right of marriage, they are asking the State to remove the marriage concept from the Church and take it upon itself, with the hope that somehow this will put an end to discrimination. 

    When gays demand that the word "marriage" be applied to a gay union, they are in fact demanding that churches recognize a gay union as valid in the eyes of God, and that the churches will not do.  But even if gays are ultimately successful in having their unions called a "marriage," that in itself will not stop the discrimination and fear.  They will still be avoided, shunned, whispered about, laughed at, become the brunt of foul and unsavory jokes, and yes, even attacked from time to time.

    It is just as wrong for gays to force themselves upon the churches as discrimination against gays is, and that is why the concept of a Civil Union came into being.  A majority of States have some form of civil union, complete with all the legal rights normally granted to unions of opposite sex couples.  My advice to gays, therefore, is to accept the civil unions and the legal advantages associated with them and stop trying to impose themselves on the churches.

  • thereluctantsinger

    Recent Posts

    Recent Comments

    Categories